The Exact Replica Threshold for Nonlinear Moments of Quantum States
Abstract
Joint measurements on multiple copies of a quantum state provide access to nonlinear observables such as $\operatorname{tr}(Ο^t)$, but whether replica number marks a sharp information-theoretic resource boundary has remained unclear. For every fixed order $t\ge 3$, existing protocols show that $\lceil t/2\rceil$ replicas already suffice for polynomial-sample estimation of $\operatorname{tr}(Ο^t)$, yet it has remained open whether one fewer replica must necessarily incur a sample-complexity barri...
Description / Details
Joint measurements on multiple copies of a quantum state provide access to nonlinear observables such as , but whether replica number marks a sharp information-theoretic resource boundary has remained unclear. For every fixed order , existing protocols show that replicas already suffice for polynomial-sample estimation of , yet it has remained open whether one fewer replica must necessarily incur a sample-complexity barrier growing with the dimension. We prove that this is indeed the case in the sample/copy-access model with replica-limited joint measurements: any protocol restricted to replicas requires dimension-growing sample complexity, while replicas suffice by prior work. Thus the exact replica threshold for fixed-order pure moments is . Equivalently, for fixed-order pure moments, one additional coherent replica is not merely useful but marks the exact threshold between polynomial-sample estimation and a dimension-growing regime in the replica-limited model. We further show that the same threshold law extends to a broad family of observable-weighted moments , including Pauli observables and other observables with bounded operator norm and macroscopic trace norm. Coherent replica number therefore acts as a genuinely discrete resource for nonlinear quantum-state estimation.
Source: arXiv:2604.22627v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22627v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22627v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22627v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Apr 27, 2026
Quantum Computing
Quantum Physics
0