A Theory of Covenant Accounting Adjustment
Abstract
We develop an incomplete-contracting model with accounting-based covenants to study how covenant accounting adjustments are made and what properties they exhibit. Standard accounting rules (e.g., GAAP) can generate false-alarm errors or undue-optimism errors. The manager can exert costly effort to privately identify these errors and propose adjustments. If errors are not corrected, control rights may be inefficiently allocated, leading to costly renegotiation. We show that (1) adjustments always...
Description / Details
We develop an incomplete-contracting model with accounting-based covenants to study how covenant accounting adjustments are made and what properties they exhibit. Standard accounting rules (e.g., GAAP) can generate false-alarm errors or undue-optimism errors. The manager can exert costly effort to privately identify these errors and propose adjustments. If errors are not corrected, control rights may be inefficiently allocated, leading to costly renegotiation. We show that (1) adjustments always correct false-alarm errors, but correct undue-optimism errors only when their magnitude is small; and (2) the manager may expend socially wasteful effort to identify these errors. The model yields testable empirical predictions and policy implications.
Source: arXiv:2604.15661v1 - http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15661v1 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.15661v1 Original Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15661v1
Please sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Apr 20, 2026
Environmental Science
Economics
0